$21.7 Million Funding Request Anchors Case for New 135 King Street Police Headquarters

Related Topics: Public Safety Building

Key Points

  • Public Safety Facilities Committee finalized a $21.7 million funding request for Town Meeting
  • Chief John Dockray detailed current facility failures including lack of victim privacy and unsafe fentanyl testing conditions
  • Committee rejected Elm Street renovation due to state housing constraints and high relocation costs
  • MassDOT may fund and install new traffic signals at the King Street and Route 3A project site
  • Project narrative shifted to emphasize community safety and trauma-informed response for victims

The Public Safety Facilities Committee finalized its strategy for Town Meeting this week, centering the presentation of Article 21 on a $21,783,000 funding request to construct a new police headquarters at 135 King Street. While the total project cost is estimated at approximately $32 million, committee member Rich noted that $5.4 million has already been expended on the multi-year effort, which included a pivot to a leaner design following the removal of a fire substation from the plans last year. Rich told the committee, The total project will be about $32 million... that leaves us with the ask of $21,783,000 at Town Meeting on Monday.

Chair Sean Keneally emphasized the urgency of the upcoming vote, noting that the replacement of the current police station has been on the town’s long-term capital budget since 2005. We've been working to this point for the last couple of years. Seems longer. But it's go time now, Keneally said, adding that the committee intends to provide physical handouts at Town Meeting to ensure residents can see the details of the proposal despite the typically poor lighting in the high school auditorium.

The committee spent significant time detailing the operational failures of the existing station to bolster the narrative for the new facility. Commander Greg Lennon highlighted the dangerous conditions officers face, specifically pointing to photos of narcotics processing. For the record, that's the testing of fentanyl on a table, Lennon said, illustrating the lack of dedicated laboratory or processing space. Chief John Dockray advocated for a trauma-informed design, noting that the current layout forces victims of sexual assault or domestic violence to wait in public lobbies or even on the front lawn. It's important that if someone does come into the lobby of the station and they're very upset, something bad has happened, that we can escort them into an area where they can feel safe and protected, Dockray said.

Committee member Kathy urged the team to focus on how the facility impacts the public rather than just internal logistics. I think the focus should be on how this is making the community less safe and not so much about how it's disrupting a particular police person, she noted, suggesting that the narrative emphasize that the town deserves better. Another committee member echoed this concern, suggesting the financial slides be simplified so residents do not panic at the $32 million total figure and instead focus on the $21.7 million specific appropriation request.

Regarding site selection, the committee reiterated why the existing Elm Street location is no longer viable. Keneally explained that expanding the current site would be prohibitively expensive and require the temporary relocation of both police and fire departments. He also noted that nearby state-owned housing prevents expansion in certain directions. Architect Amy Dunlap and Nate Sppa presented updated site plans for 135 King Street, which include separated public and employee parking. Commander Lennon added that MassDOT has signaled a willingness to install traffic signals at the King Street and Route 3A intersection at the state's own expense, potentially resolving long-standing traffic flow concerns for the area.

Architect Amy Dunlap worked with the committee to refine the financial slides during the meeting to ensure clarity on the debt service impact. I put the estimated total project cost of the 32 million minus the expenditures to date... and that's what you still need to fund, Dunlap explained. The committee ultimately decided to move more complex debt service charts to an appendix to avoid confusing voters in the high-stakes environment of the Town Meeting floor.