Revised 3-Lot Plan for South Main St. Gains Board Endorsement

Key Points

  • A revised "Approval Not Required" plan for a three-lot subdivision at 383-405R South Main Street was endorsed.
  • The board received in-depth training on the Massachusetts Open Meeting Law and Conflict of Interest Law from Town Counsel.
  • The training highlighted a strict recusal requirement for any board member who is an abutter to a project under review.
  • Board members learned that deliberations should not occur over email, text, or social media, even to correct public misinformation.
  • The applicant for the South Main Street project will return for a future hearing on a proposed common driveway.

The Cohasset Planning Board endorsed a revised plan for a three-lot subdivision at 383-405R South Main Street and underwent a detailed training session on state ethics and public meeting laws during its October 15 meeting. The "Approval Not Required" (ANR) plan, a continuation from a previous meeting, was updated after Town Counsel raised concerns that all proposed lots must have frontage on a public way. The applicant, Van York Development, submitted a new plan that satisfied the legal requirements.

Gregory Morris of Morris Engineering, representing the applicant, presented the changes which consolidate the rear parcels into a single lot with the required frontage. The project proposes to replace an existing home with three new ones, accessed by a common driveway. "We believe the plan's entitled to endorsement," Morris stated. "Every lot has the minimum frontage on a roadway that's accepted in the town of Cohasset." Board member Birgit Schmidt-Wesche agreed the revisions were satisfactory, noting, "I see [Town Counsel's] comments and that has been addressed and so I'm still fine." Following a brief discussion, a motion was made by Birgit Schmidt-Wesche to "endorse the ANR as as modified." The motion was seconded and passed unanimously, 4-0. The applicant will return to the board in the future for a common driveway permit.

The remainder of the meeting was dedicated to a comprehensive legal training session led by Town Counsel Carolyn Murray, covering the nuances of the Open Meeting and Conflict of Interest laws. The board engaged in a detailed discussion covering everything from email and social media communications to the proper procedure for executive sessions. Member Amy Glasmeier sought advice on navigating sensitive situations, asking for "a diplomatic way of indicating how you don't want to make your colleague feel uncomfortable, but you also realize that what they're doing is eroding the regulation." Vice Chair Clark Brewer noted his appreciation for the interactive session, promising to be "as active a participant as necessary."

Chair Kevin Heine raised several questions, including one about document accessibility for residents with visual impairments. Murray emphasized the strict rules surrounding conflicts of interest, particularly for land use boards. She explained that any board member who is an abutter or an abutter-to-an-abutter of a project is presumed to have a financial interest and "must recuse yourself from participating in any matter." The training served as a critical refresher on the laws designed to ensure government transparency and ethical conduct. At the conclusion of the training, a motion was made by Clark Brewer to adjourn. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously, 5-0, by roll call vote.